Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Back to 9WSYR.COM Your Corner Home Your Corner Blogs Your Corner Forums Your Corner Photos Your Corner Community Calendar

NC9 Sports Chat

Tiger Does it Again.

Posted by Steve Infanti - Another win, another trophy, another record on Sunday. Woods ran away with the Accenture Match Play Championship beating Stewart Cink in the finals 8&7 -- that's the largest margin of victory in the event's history.  In fact, it's the fourth straight tournament in which he's set a scoring record.
 
Tiger's current winning streak started on September 3, 2007.  That's right, he hasn't so much as finished second in almost six full months.  It's crazy to think that Woods could win everything he plays in this year, or is it?  According to the Associated Press, when asked if a "perfect season" was in reach, Tiger replied:  "That's my intent.  That's why you play. It you don't believe you can win an event, don't show up."
 
Woods is so good that he makes the impossible seem possible.  He has accomplished just about everything in the game of golf -- except for winning the Grand Slam (all four majors) in the sane year.  Tiger is playing so well that the Grand Slam is "easily within reach" -- those are his words.
 
So, what do you think, is this the year?  Will Tiger capture the Masters, the British Open, the U.S. Open, and the PGA Championship by season's end?
 
I'm certainly not going to be the one to say that he can't do it...
Published Monday, February 25, 2008 1:13 PM by shaunganley

Comments

 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

tom f said:

tiger woods easily , is the greatest golfer of THIS ERA. a grand slam is definetly in his reach. the courses are in his realm , and the competition is the weakest of any era. is tiger that great ; to make everyone else look weak. in this era. the way to gage this is look at career wins and strroke average of the top twenty  and compare to the eighties, sewventies , sixties, and fifties; the all time greats ;top 50; come within jack nicklaus era; there are none intigers era. jack is the greatest of all time, no matter how many majors tiger wins; this year he will win two majors, although 4 is not out of reach.
February 25, 2008 5:48 PM
 

CayugaHam said:

I really think 24 posts of the same message is enough, tom f.

Tiger, from his very beginnings in golf, has changed many aspects of the sport for the better. He is a joy to watch. I think this is the beginning of a perfect year for him.
February 25, 2008 10:03 PM
 

Golfer said:

I don't know about that.  Tiger Woods is pretty good but you can't rule out Billy Madison.  
February 26, 2008 12:58 PM
 

lost ballz said:

Shooter McGavin was great.  Can't forget tin cup.  Tom easy there big guy.  Tiger needs to be viewed as one the best golfers of any ear.
February 26, 2008 1:09 PM
 

Bob Barker said:

I will have to argue about Shooter and Madsion.  I kicked Madison's butt by the pond and could have beat McGavin with the other hand.
February 26, 2008 1:18 PM
 

Golfer said:

I lost my mind I met to say that Happy Gilmore should be considered.  If Bob Barker was not so old and so focused on his spayed animals he would have caught that little mistake.
February 26, 2008 1:23 PM
 

lost ballz said:

Listen Bob you can't even walk 9 holes without breaking a hip.
February 26, 2008 1:28 PM
 

Mark said:

<a href=http://jokingly.cn/discount-generic-cialis.html >discount generic cialis</a>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/buy-cheap-generic-viagra.html >buy cheap generic viagra</a>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/viagra-prescription-online.html >viagra prescription online<a/>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/sildenafil-side-effects.html >sildenafil side effects</a>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/levitra-20-mg.html >levitra 20 mg</a>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/sildenafil-cheap.html >sildenafil cheap</a>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/tramadol-used-for.html >tramadol used for</a>
<a href=http://jokingly.cn/pills.html >pills</a>
March 13, 2008 8:27 PM
 

Hil said:

<a href=http://nutwood.cn/map.html >pills</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/tramadol-pill.html >tramadol pill</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/penis-enlargement-pill.html >penis enlargement pill</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/sex-pill.html >sex pill</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/viagra-pill.html >viagra pill</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/prescription-weight-loss-pill.html >prescription weight loss pill</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/best-diet-pill.html >best diet pill</a>
<a href=http://nutwood.cn/phentermine-pill.html >phentermine pill</a>
March 17, 2008 7:22 PM
 

Nikolet said:

Nice site!
March 19, 2008 9:08 PM
 

slots said:

en4fzto-a952ans-tw6q2010-0 <a href="http://www.google.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=MKRCVFW&adurl=//bestsslscripts.com/goog/online-casino-gambling.html#2">online casino gambling</a>
http://www.cys.ru/forward.html?url=bestsslscripts.com/cys/viagra.html#1
<a href="http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=ultram+%3CIFRAME%20src=//bestsslscripts.com/medved/ultram.html%3E#3" target="_blank" title="http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=ultram+%3CIFRAME%20src=//bestsslscripts.com/medved/ultram.html%3E#3">ultram</a>
<a href="http://www.cys.ru/forward.html?url=bestsslscripts.com/cys/cialis.html#4" target="_blank" title="http://www.cys.ru/forward.html?url=bestsslscripts.com/cys/cialis.html#4">http://www.cys.ru/forward.html?url=bestsslscripts.com/cys/cialis.html#4</a>
[http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=casino+%3CIFRAME%20src=//bestsslscripts.com/medved/casino.html%3E#5 casino]
"slots":http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=slots+%3CIFRAME%20src=//bestsslscripts.com/medved/index.html%3E#6
[LINK http://www.cys.ru/forward.html?url=bestsslscripts.com/cys/tramadol.html#7]tramadol[/LINK]
March 20, 2008 7:57 PM
 

Neli said:

<a href=http://imporous.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://importee.cn/map.html
<a href=http://importee.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://jointed.cn/map.html
<a href=http://jointed.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://jolite.cn/map.html
<a href=http://jolite.cn/map.html >online</a>
March 21, 2008 8:43 AM
 

Lina said:

<a href=http://nuvistor.cn/map.html >pills</a>
http://mythically.cn/map.html
<a href=http://mythically.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://nutsch.cn/map.html
<a href=http://nutsch.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://nutsche.cn/map.html
<a href=http://nutsche.cn/map.html >online</a>
<a href=http://meds10top.com/online-prescription-viagra.html >online prescription viagra</a>
<a href=http://meds10top.com/tramadol-and-acetaminophen.html >tramadol and acetaminophen</a>
March 22, 2008 10:29 PM
 

Lina said:

<a href=http://nuvistor.cn/map.html >pills</a>
http://mythically.cn/map.html
<a href=http://mythically.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://nutsch.cn/map.html
<a href=http://nutsch.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://nutsche.cn/map.html
<a href=http://nutsche.cn/map.html >online</a>
<a href=http://meds10top.com/online-prescription-viagra.html >online prescription viagra</a>
<a href=http://meds10top.com/tramadol-and-acetaminophen.html >tramadol and acetaminophen</a>
March 23, 2008 6:15 AM
 

Bobe said:

http://meds10top.com/cialis-drug-levitra-viagra.html
<a href=http://meds10top.com/cialis-drug-levitra-viagra.html >cialis drug levitra viagra</a>
http://meds10top.com/cheap-cialis.html
<a href=http://meds10top.com/cheap-cialis.html >cheap cialis</a>
http://meds10top.com/ultram-price.html
<a href=http://meds10top.com/ultram-price.html >ultram price</a>
http://meds10top.com/cialis-drug-levitra-viagra.html
<a href=http://meds10top.com/cialis-drug-levitra-viagra.html >cialis drug levitra viagra</a>
http://meds10top.com/buy-sildenafil-online.html
<a href=http://meds10top.com/buy-sildenafil-online.html >buy sildenafil online</a>
March 25, 2008 7:04 PM
 

Milena said:

<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/map.html >pills</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/buying-ultram.html >buying ultram</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/sildenafil-tablet.html >sildenafil tablet</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/cialis-prescription.html >cialis prescription</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/viagra-professional.html >viagra professional</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/female-version-viagra.html >female version viagra</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/buy-kamagra-online.html >buy kamagra online</a>
<a href=http://nuttallius.cn/female-viagra.html >female viagra</a>
March 28, 2008 11:47 AM
 

Bela said:

http://oxgall.cn/map.html
http://pyroborate.cn/map.html
http://pyroboric.cn/map.html
<a href=http://oxgall.cn/map.html >online</a>
<a href=http://pyroborate.cn/map.html >online</a>
<a href=http://pyroboric.cn/map.html >online</a>
March 29, 2008 5:05 PM
 

Bill said:

<a href=http://mystox.cn/map.html >pills</a>
<a href=http://quitches.cn/boys-in-underwear.html >boys in underwear</a>
<a href=http://quitches.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://quitches.cn/map.html
http://pyrocatechol.cn/map.html
<a href=http://pyrocatechol.cn/map.html >online</a>
http://quitclaim.cn/map.html
<a href=http://quitclaim.cn/map.html >online</a>
<a href=http://quitclaim.cn/cache-browser.html >cache browser</a>
March 30, 2008 5:07 PM
 

Willi said:

<a href=http://mystox.cn/buy-cheap-purchase-uk-viagra.html >buy cheap purchase uk viagra</a>
<a href=http://mystox.cn/canada-cialis.html >canada cialis</a>
<a href=http://mystox.cn/sildenafil-citrate-soft-tabs.html >sildenafil citrate soft tabs</a>
<a href=http://mystox.cn/tramadol-ultram.html >tramadol ultram</a>
<a href=http://mystox.cn/buy-cheap-cialis.html >buy-cheap cialis</a>
April 2, 2008 1:57 AM
 

Said said:

<a href=http://tritttonz.info/business-cards-templates.html >business cards templates</a>
<a href=http://tritttonz.info/brittney-james.html >brittney james</a>
<a href=http://tritttonz.info/butterfly-cell-phone.html >butterfly cell phone</a>
<a href=http://tritttonz.info/brookfield-library-brookfield-mass.html >brookfield library brookfield mass</a>
<a href=http://tritttonz.info/buy-asa-softball-double-first-base.html >buy asa softball double first base</a>
<a href=http://tritttonz.info/burlington-chocolate-fest.html >burlington chocolate fest</a>
<a href=http://tritttonz.info/business-cards.html >business cards</a>
April 7, 2008 9:13 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<February 2008>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728291
2345678

Syndication
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.