Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Back to 9WSYR.COM Your Corner Home Your Corner Blogs Your Corner Forums Your Corner Photos Your Corner Community Calendar

From the Newsroom

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign

Post by Dan Cummings - She's our U.S. Senator and she will remain just that, for now.  Or, vice-presidential candidate. Or, someday, maybe...secretary of health and human services.  Or, someday, maybe...an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.  Or, none of the above.
 
Two things occur to me:  
 
One, regardless of what you think of her politically or personally, Hillary Clinton's campaign made it's mark.  Thanks to some critical strategic blunders born of hubris, she fell short, but just short.  Neither she, nor her millions of supporters can be taken lightly.  Her campaign meant something.
 
Two, it may take some time for the nation to realize that this week has made its own mark on history.  There'sa convention and a general election ahead of us...but this was the week when Senator Barack Obama became the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party for President of the United States.   Either way, the Democrats were poised to make history, by nominating either a woman or an African-American.   In the moment, it may be difficult to capture the significance of Obama's candidacy.  But schoolkids in generations to come will learn about 2008 as a watershed year in U.S. politics.
 
Less than a year ago, few were giving Senator Obama much of a chance.  Senator Clinton was the "inevitable" nominee.  (She certainly thought so).  What remains to be seen:  how vigorous will she be in support of the Obama candidacy?    It may make all the difference come November.
Published Friday, June 06, 2008 5:58 PM by PHRankin
Filed Under:

Comments

 

crat3 said:

Sen. Clinton made no "strategic blunders."  Instead, her campaign was sabotaged by pro-Obama biased media leaving her campaign with millions of dollars in debt.
`
Sen. Clinton should be the Democratic presidential nominee. Obama did not get the nomination fair and square. He clinched a stolen nomination with hijacked MI delegates, and de facto Obama surrogate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rigged the nomination for Obama.

Sen. Clinton's supporters in the swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan should work for Obama's defeat and vote for McCain. Obama must win atleast three of these states in November. I will volunteer and vote for McCain in a swing state.

Sen. Clinton won the primaries for all four swing states. She was the best qualified and the strongest presidential candidate to win the general election in a landslide victory hands down. This was trumped by Pelosi's rigged nomination for Obama.

The key for Obama to win in November lies with Sen. Clinton's supporters in the swing states; for Obama, that key is lost for 2008 but it opens the door to 2012 for Sen. Clinton, when she can reform a corrupt Democratic Party.
June 6, 2008 5:55 PM
 

tom f said:

brilliantly said and accurate too,crat3. obama won a rigged election by clinton haters within their own party. without hillary on this ticket with the enigmatic obama , he will be crushed by 70 percent of the nations vote. if primarys were electoral votes ,clinton won by 150 votes. she won the plural vote ; and without florida and michigan she would have won with the dirty media tactics of the obama political machine. obamas objectives are racially motivated and a strange foreign policy ,breaking bread with terrostists as young children are being massecured. more black racial hate and crimes will increase in this mans administration. chaos inthe senate and congres as his secretary of state, the leader of the black caucus,a cover [veil] for the corrupt militant black muslims. this is what black voters and misguided ignorant youth [18-29] his sick political constinuency,  hillary could beat both ,but since she was betrayed by the democratic party [also president clinton] , she should become the vice president  candidate for mccain; 82 percent victory; also if there is a deal in place for vp with obama ,bill clinton should be secretary of state ,in these turbelent times in foreign policy. where are you, facefurney.
June 6, 2008 6:20 PM
 

docbud said:

crat and tomf--

Hillary messed up because she under-estimated Obama and looked down her nose at him.

While I am in no means at all a fan of Obama, he won it fair and square. Blame Hillary and her advisors (as well as loud-mouth Bill) for her not winning.

Back to the topic that Dan Cummings started: I don't think Hillary will be VP. I do see her having a cabinet position or maybe a supreme court position.

I think Hillary is the last person Obama wants on his ticket. He doesn't need Bill Clinton running around in the White House again banging interns.

doc
June 7, 2008 7:56 PM
 

john said:

She should run as a indepentant. All her demo buddies stabbed her in the back.
June 8, 2008 11:34 AM
 

sderby said:

Alright all of you democratic supporters. Each of this candidates have their negative issues. Hillary turned into a mudslinger as soon as Obama started gaining popularity. She threw a temper tantrum because she went into this race expecting to blow everyone else out of the water and it didn't happens. The Clinton's have always gotten their way and are not used to having to work hard at what they want. Yes, she has done alot for NYS but I am glad she didn't get the nomination. Surprisingly, I am a woman voter myself so this should surprise all of you men.

On the other end of the coin, Obama doesn't really have all of my support either. He belonged to a church with questionable beliefs, his campaign slung mud right back at Clinton. His good aspects are he's not a D.C. lifer like most other politicians. He knows what it's like to bust his rear end to keep food on the table.  He has stood up for what he believed in even if what he believed wasn't popular.

Everyone needs to remember that none of us lead perfect lives and that we shouldn't expect our leaders to be perfect. Also, maybe we should all step back and take a look into our own lives. What we dislike the most about the candidates tend to be characteristics of ourselves.
June 8, 2008 5:18 PM
 

tom f said:

good points from all bloggers. sometimes , its hard to see the forrest thru the trees.this may be the most critical election in the history . middle east, china , are coming to a head ; north korea ; what do you think obama is going to do withy them;  crying racial or playing the race card like he has done already is not going to work; the rest of the civilzed world dont go for that pathetic crap. [ check this with condalesa rice and north korea]  the economy is in the brink of depression; crime is 90 percent increase since obama candacy ; the only person to pull this of are the clintons. to the sad person who dissed president clinton, ignorance is bliss; so you must be a blissful , and very tiny person. we had no national debt with the clintons; also foreign affairs were in relatrively good order; we were 900 billion  dollars surplus when he left ; now 3 trillion national debt; mccain; depression or obama chaos and civil war[you choose]
June 9, 2008 11:36 AM
 

tom f said:

good points from all bloggers. sometimes , its hard to see the forrest thru the trees.this may be the most critical election in the history . middle east, china , are coming to a head ; north korea ; what do you think obama is going to do withy them;  crying racial or playing the race card like he has done already is not going to work; the rest of the civilzed world dont go for that pathetic crap. [ check this with condalesa rice and north korea]  the economy is in the brink of depression; crime is 90 percent increase since obama candacy ; the only person to pull this of are the clintons. to the sad person who dissed president clinton, ignorance is bliss; so you must be a blissful , and very tiny person. we had no national debt with the clintons; also foreign affairs were in relatrively good order; we were 900 billion  dollars surplus when he left ; now 3 trillion national debt; mccain; depression or obama chaos and civil war[you choose]
June 9, 2008 11:36 AM
 

sderby said:

Tom I have to say I don't agree with you. Bill Clinton had some very negative aspects during his time in the white house. You can call me ignorant, blissful, and tiny all you want. The truth is this: Clinton made several attempts to take away our right to bear arms. This is ignorance on his part. His wife will probably attempt to the same thing as will Obama. I am in no way endorsing Obama or McCain. And I stand by my negative comments about the Clintons and they are silver-spooners and always will be. Having the Clintons in the white house again will destroy our country.  What we as a people need to do is to take back our country. The democratic and repulican candidates are jokes. Screwed 2008!
June 9, 2008 3:03 PM
 

tom fr said:

sderby, please get a book about government and study it. the clinton years was the most peaceful and strong economy since 1964. when your a democrat ,you make concessions in regards to special interst groups[gun control] when pres. clinton was governor of arkansas everyone had two guns and a pot to piss in. there was no gun control there. no welfare and no economic crisis . clinton left the presidency with the highest approval in us history 70 percent. today,its the darkest day in american history ; without a solid economy and foreign policy, we leave ourselves open to iminent danger from the middle east and the sleeping giant,CHINA, china is laughing at obama ; we need the experience and bs of clinton to get us back on track ; as isaid before , obama playing the race card with china and the middle east creates a huge laughter from these people; lets pray we dont get blown off the map.
June 10, 2008 6:27 PM
 

I am moving to canada said:

Clinton and Obama are both worthless, and have not chance at sucesssfully running our country. The USA is going to hell in a hand basket. Well, at least Clinton can anwser questions unlike Obama. hahaha
June 11, 2008 11:44 AM
 

Ronald Auguste (RGAaPoet@aol.com) said:


IF SHE REMAINS THE BEACON THEY CAN’T SEE

Barack Obama does not stand a chance
If he keeps Hillary Clinton from his side,
For though he sings a sweet song, and can dance,
Without her he’s too narrow … or too wide….

Although his talks of change bring some delights,
Her strengths will take him to the farthest heights.

Mistakenly, some folks say she’s amiss,
While genuflecting to Obama – Yet
Not one of them can know who heralds bliss;
Whose inborn skills will win November’s bet.

Since both are full of light, each firm and sure,
Bypassing Clinton will mute his allure.

That Hillary Clinton really is as good,
Or better than Obama, there’s no doubt!
Oh may that thought, in depth, be understood,
As all Obama’s mentors thrash about….

If she remains the beacon they can’t see,
McCain will sing, and dance, and shout in glee!




     05/23/2008

Copyright © 2008 by Ronald G. Auguste


O may you walk smooth roads, suffused in Light,
Not caring but for Kindness, Truth, and Right!

© 1989 by RGA

Please note: No Supporter of Senator Hillary Clinton should vote for Senator Barack Obama for the Presidency of The United States if Obama does NOT select Senator Hillary Clinton as his running mate for the Vice-Presidency….

Note, also, that you have my permission to use my poem, listed above, as you would like to do ... properly....

Sincerely, RGA
June 11, 2008 9:12 PM
 

sderby said:

Tom like I said, Hillary wouldn't be good for the white house. Neither will Obama. The same thing with McCain. You're entitled to your opinion of Hillary regardless of the truth. Just keep in mind that Hillary Clinton is NOT Bill Clinton and won't be the same kind of leader. Don't confuse one for the other. Also, I have read my history books and what you're forgetting is that they only print what they want you to know. And by the way, not everything is learned by reading a book. Everything sounds good on paper but then sucks in what we call reality. I am not, and never will be, a Clinton, Obama, or McCain supporter. My opinion of election '08 is SCREWED '08. We need to take back the government as the government is corrupt and way past dysfuntional. The sooner America wakes up, the sooner she'll see the truth staring her in the face.
June 11, 2008 9:28 PM
 

Kelly said:

I agree that the media was sexist and biased.  Had Hillary been on a level playing field with Obama, I believe the outcome would have been far different and massively in her favor.  The fact that she withstood the onslaught of negativity by the media and the virtual campaigning they were doing for Obama, is a testament to how powerful, intelligent, and savvy of a woman she is.  I am digusted with this entire election process and although I am a proud democrat, I would find it difficult, if not impossible to vote for Obama unless Hillary was on that ticket.  I think many democrats feel the same and Obama would be costing himself thousands of votes and probably the election without her.
June 11, 2008 10:37 PM
 

Dave said:

Clinton or Obama for president, I would vote for neither. The Clintons ran this country into the ground. Its a dream that they did any good for the country. How soon the pardons are forgotten and the sleepovers in  the white house. Jonny Chung, the sale of missile technology to China ect. I don't have time to write a book on missdeeds The bj in the white house was the icing on the cake. Mc Cain is a joke he is a lib in sheep clothing. I'm a true consertive, I'm voting the libertarion party this Nov
June 13, 2008 8:08 AM
 

sderby said:

Applauds Dave as he has made the most sense aside from myself so far. Thank You Dave!!!! You are right on the money with this and hopefully all those Clinton Lovers will see the error of their ways. the future of this country is grim no matter which way you look at it unless we take back our government...."We The People" no longer holds true so we need to go back to our roots.
June 13, 2008 8:39 AM
 

tom f said:

dave , you and sderby should get a room ; you two are the reason the country is where its at right now. im tired of talking truth and facts to a couple of bush heads; i give up with you shallow people ;im moving to nevada where its probably the freest state in the union[ also italians  own the state] im safe there.
June 13, 2008 2:37 PM
 

sderby said:

Tom, first of all I am NOT a Bush head. If you actually took the time to READ what I am saying you would see that. Second, you are not talking truth and facts about the Clintons and you would know this if you actually did your homework. To say that the country is where it is due to a couple of people who don't have Hillary Clinton or her husband on a pedestal as you do is humorous to me. Why don't YOU read a book about economics, politics, and american history. Stop throwing a temper tantrum because a couple of people disagree with your opinion. Remember this is America-the land of the free(because of the brave). We have the right to our beliefs just as you do.
June 13, 2008 3:57 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<June 2008>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Syndication

Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.